Product comparison · 2 monitors

NEC SpectraView 2090 computer monitor vs NEC MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor

Add a product
  • 52specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 39identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display technology
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:LCD
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:LED
  • Panel type
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:TFT/IPS
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:IPS
  • Product colour
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:Black
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:White, Silver
  • Cable lock slot
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:No
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:Yes
  • Swivel angle range
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:170 - 170°
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:-170 - 170°
  • Depth (without stand)
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:247.3 mm
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:85 mm
  • Height (without stand)
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:415.5 mm
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:340 mm
  • Weight (without stand)
    • SpectraView 2090 computer monitor:9.7 kg
    • MultiSync LCD2090UXi computer monitor:8.4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2090, LCD2090UXi
72 specifications
Display3 differ
Display technologyDiffersLCDLED
Panel typeDiffersTFT/IPSIPS
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1600 x 1200 (UXGA)720 x 400, 832 x 624, 1152 x 870, 1200 x 1600, 1280 x 960, 1024 x 768 (XGA), 1152 x 864 (XGA+), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1600 x 1200 (UXGA), 640 x 480 (VGA), 800 x 600 (SVGA)
Display surfaceKnown for oneMattUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite, Silver
Market positioningKnown for oneBusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
AC (power) inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Cable lock slotDiffersNoYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
PivotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Pivot angleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 90°
Swivel angle rangeDiffers170 - 170°-170 - 170°
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source67 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source42 W
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source439.2 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source247.3 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source415.5 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.8 kg
Depth (without stand)Differs247.3 mm85 mm
Height (without stand)Differs415.5 mm340 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs9.7 kg8.4 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersACAC, DVI
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersENERGY STAREPEAT Silver
Other features1 differ
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersLCD, 1600x1200 @ 60 HzLCD
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one100-240V; 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Special featuresKnown for oneColorComp Rapid Response RapidMotion TileMatrix TileComp OmniColor TORO Design DDC-CI NaViSet & NaViSet AdministratorUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCE; TCO’03; TÜV; TÜV GS; C-tick; GEEA/Energy; FCC Class B; PCT/Gost; UL/C-UL or CSA; CCC; ISO 13406-2 (pixel failure class II); MPR II/ MPR III; PCBC/B-mark; PSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Thin Client1 differ
Thin client installedDiffersYesNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons