All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

MSI Optix MPG27C computer monitor vs MSI Optix MPG27CQ

Add a product
  • 66specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 58identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display resolution
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
    • 2560 x 1440 pixels
  • HD type
    • Full HD
    • Quad HD
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 250 cd/m²
    • 400 cd/m²
  • Supported graphics resolutions
    • 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
    • 2560 x 1440
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
    • 0.2331 x 0.2331 mm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 59.8 cm
    • 59.7 cm
  • Digital horizontal frequency
    • 55.3 - 162 kHz
    • 70.56 - 214.56 kHz
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 65 W
    • 90 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
73 specifications
A

MSI

Optix MPG27C computer monitor

Model MPG27C

View product
B

MSI

Optix MPG27CQView product
Display7 differ
Display diagonal68.6 cm (27")68.6 cm (27")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
Native aspect ratio16:916:9
Display technologyLEDLED
TouchscreenNoNo
HD typeDiffersFull HDQuad HD
Panel typeVAVA
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²400 cd/m²
Response time1 ms1 ms
Screen shapeCurvedCurved
Screen curvature rating1800R1800R
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)2560 x 1440
Contrast ratio (typical)3000:13000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)100000000:1100000000:1
Maximum refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one178°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one178°
Display number of colours16.78 million colours16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchDiffers0.3114 x 0.3114 mm0.2331 x 0.2331 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers59.8 cm59.7 cm
Viewable size, vertical33.6 cm33.6 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyDiffers55.3 - 162 kHz70.56 - 214.56 kHz
Digital vertical frequency48 - 144 Hz48 - 144 Hz
sRGB coverage (typical)115%115%
Screen curvature180 cm180 cm
3DNoNo
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one100%
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCNoNo
AMD FreeSyncKnown for oneYes
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for oneYes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Market positioningGamingGaming
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
Built-in USB hubYesYes
USB hub version3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB upstream port typeUSB Type-BUSB Type-B
Number of upstream ports11
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity22
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity00
DVI portNoNo
HDMI ports quantity22
DisplayPorts quantity11
Headphone outYesYes
Headphone outputs11
Microphone inYesYes
PC Audio outYesYes
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingYesYes
Panel mounting interface100 x 100 mm100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotYesYes
Cable lock slot typeKensingtonKensington
Height adjustmentYesYes
Adjustable height (max)12 cm12 cm
SwivellingYesYes
Swivel angle range-40 - 40°-40 - 40°
Tilt adjustmentYesYes
Tilt angle range-5 - 20°-5 - 20°
On Screen Display (OSD)YesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs65 W90 W
AC input voltage100 - 240 V100 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Current ratingKnown for one3.42 A
Input currentKnown for one4.5 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)612 mm612 mm
Depth (with stand)379.3 mm379.3 mm
Height (with stand)555.8 mm555.8 mm
Weight (with stand)7.6 kg7.6 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weight10.6 kg10.6 kg
Other featuresidentical
On/off switchYesYes
TV tuner integratedNoNo
No flickeringYesYes
Supplied AC adapter typeLEDLED
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedNoNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons