Product comparison · 2 monitors

LG L1942H-SF computer monitor vs Viewsonic Value Series VA2616W computer monitor

21specifications compared
12differ
9identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:64.8 cm (25.5")
Display resolution
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:1920 x 1200 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:350 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:8000:1
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:800:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:176°
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:170°
Horizontal scan range
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:24 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan range
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:56 - 75 Hz
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:50 - 85 Hz
Power consumption (typical)
- L1942H-SF computer monitor:33 W
- Value Series VA2616W computer monitor:64 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of L1942H-SF, VA2616W
39 specifications	A LG L1942H-SF computer monitor Model L1942H-SF View product	B Viewsonic Value Series VA2616W computer monitor Model VA2616W View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	64.8 cm (25.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1200 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	8000:1	800:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	176°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	170°	170°
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 83 kHz	24 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 75 Hz	50 - 85 Hz
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.294 x 0.294 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Built-in camera	No	No
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
HDCP	Yes	Yes
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 20°
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	33 W	64 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	596 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	254 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	480 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.4 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	406.3 mm	596 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	236.7 mm	93 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	463.7 mm	406 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.6 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificates	ENERGY STAR	ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	550 x 344 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC 100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 h
CertificationDiffers	TCO'03, ISO 13406-2	UL, cUL, FCC-B, CB, CE, NOM, IRAM, NEMKO/ERGO, BSMI, CCC, PSB, CTICK, RoHS, WEEE, VCCI, GOST-R, SASO, TCO’03

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons