Product comparison · 2 monitors

LG L1930S computer monitor vs Samsung SyncMaster B2240

21specifications compared
13differ
8identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- L1930S computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- SyncMaster B2240:54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolution
- L1930S computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
- SyncMaster B2240:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- L1930S computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- SyncMaster B2240:300 cd/m²
Response time
- L1930S computer monitor:12 ms
- SyncMaster B2240:5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- L1930S computer monitor:400:1
- SyncMaster B2240:1000:1
Viewing angle, vertical
- L1930S computer monitor:170°
- SyncMaster B2240:160°
Pixel pitch
- L1930S computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm
- SyncMaster B2240:0.24825 x 0.24825 mm
DVI-D ports quantity
- L1930S computer monitor:0
- SyncMaster B2240:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of L1930S, SyncMaster B2240
48 specifications	A LG L1930S computer monitor Model L1930S View product	B Samsung SyncMaster B2240 View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	12 ms	5 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	400:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70000:1
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	170°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.294 x 0.294 mm	0.24825 x 0.24825 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 81 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 75 Hz
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Composite syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	56 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfaces2 differ
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	0	1
HDCPDiffers	No	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 x 75 mm
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stand-by
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.3 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	513.2 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	190 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	341.2 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	444 mm	513.2 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	112 mm	68 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	424 mm	309.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	8.5 kg	4.9 kg
Stand weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	586 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	188 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	386 mm
Other featuresidentical
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MagicBright3, MagicEco, MagicAngle
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DDC 2B
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO 5.0 TCO'03

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons