Product comparison · 2 monitors

LG 22" LCD L226WTQ vs LG L1953PM computer monitor

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 9identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:55.9 cm (22")
    • L1953PM computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • L1953PM computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:3000:1
    • L1953PM computer monitor:5000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:0.282 x 0.282 mm
    • L1953PM computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:45 W
    • L1953PM computer monitor:39 W
  • Width (without stand)
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:501.7 mm
    • L1953PM computer monitor:402 mm
  • Depth (without stand)
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:233.9 mm
    • L1953PM computer monitor:437.2 mm
  • Height (without stand)
    • 22" LCD L226WTQ:423.5 mm
    • L1953PM computer monitor:242.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 22" LCD L226WTQ, L1953PM
43 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5:4
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response time2 ms2 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5:4
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:15000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal170°170°
Viewing angle, vertical170°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.282 x 0.282 mm0.294 x 0.294 mm
Horizontal scan range30 - 83 kHz30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan range56 - 75 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48.3 cm
Colour gamut standardKnown for onesRGBUnknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSilver
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Headphone outputsKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one15-pin Mini D-sub, DVI-DUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
Adjustable height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14 cm
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 25°
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs45 W39 W
Power consumption (standby)1 W1 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs501.7 mm402 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs233.9 mm437.2 mm
Height (without stand)Differs423.5 mm242.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5.65 kg6.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceVGA
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features2 differ
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.135 GHz
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source376 x 301 mm
Power requirementsDiffersLIPS90 - 264 Vac, 47 - 63 Hz
Signal inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDVI-D, RGB
CertificationDiffersUL, UL-cUL, TUV-GS, SEMCO, FCC-B, CE, EPADDCCI, TCO03, DIN-ISO 13406-2, TÜV-GS, CE, UL, CSA, SEMKO, FCC-B, VCCI-2, C-TICK
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons