Product comparison · 2 monitors

Lenovo L27-41 Monitor vs Lenovo ThinkVision S22e-19

45specifications compared
16differ
29identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- L27-41 Monitor:68.6 cm (27")
- ThinkVision S22e-19:54.6 cm (21.5")
Panel type
- L27-41 Monitor:IPS
- ThinkVision S22e-19:VA
Display brightness (typical)
- L27-41 Monitor:300 cd/m²
- ThinkVision S22e-19:250 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- L27-41 Monitor:1500:1
- ThinkVision S22e-19:3000:1
Maximum refresh rate
- L27-41 Monitor:100 Hz
- ThinkVision S22e-19:60 Hz
Pixel pitch
- L27-41 Monitor:0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
- ThinkVision S22e-19:0.248 x 0.248 mm
Pixel density
- L27-41 Monitor:82 ppi
- ThinkVision S22e-19:102 ppi
Colour gamut
- L27-41 Monitor:99%
- ThinkVision S22e-19:72%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of L27-41, ThinkVision S22e-19
65 specifications	A Lenovo L27-41 Monitor Model L27-41 View product	B Lenovo ThinkVision S22e-19 View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display technologyKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
TouchscreenKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeDiffers	IPS	VA
LED backlightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Backlight typeKnown for one	W-LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1500:1	3000:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	100 Hz	60 Hz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.3114 x 0.3114 mm	0.248 x 0.248 mm
Pixel densityDiffers	82 ppi	102 ppi
Colour gamutDiffers	99%	72%
sRGB coverage (typical)Known for one	99%	Unknown — not stated by the source
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72%
Performance1 differ
AMD FreeSyncDiffers	No	Yes
Design1 differ
Colour nameDiffers	Raven Black	Black
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power5 differ
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	16.3 kWh	11.5 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs	17 W	18 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.2 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	3 W	22 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.3 W	0.2 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for one	611.9 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	210 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	443.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	4.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Known for one	611.9 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	44.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	366.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Known for one	3.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (side)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	690 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	111 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	525 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	6.4 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	RoHS, EU Energy Efficiency Level (Level-D), Volatile Organic Compound Certification, None	Energy Star Certified, TCO 7.0, TCO Edge 2.0, EPEAT Silver, ULE Gold, RoHS, TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons