Product comparison · 2 monitors

Lenovo F19238FL0 computer monitor vs Lenovo T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor

Add a product
  • 2specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 0identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal: 61 cm (24") on the Lenovo F19238FL0 computer monitor, 38.1 cm (15") on the Lenovo T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Lenovo F19238FL0 computer monitor, 1024 x 768 pixels on the Lenovo T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • F19238FL0 computer monitor:61 cm (24")
    • T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor:38.1 cm (15")
  • Display resolution
    • F19238FL0 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor:1024 x 768 pixels

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of F19238FL0, T560 15.0" Hybrid TFT LCD TCO-99 Business Black Colour Monitor
36 specifications
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers61 cm (24")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
TouchscreenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Display brightness (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 cd/m²
Response timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300:1
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90°
Pixel pitchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.297
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source31 - 61 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30.4 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.8 cm
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:9Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomicsidentical
Swivel angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-37 - 145°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
ErgonomicsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceISO 13406 Part 2
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneCUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for oneNot availableUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one12 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.3 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.3 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeKnown for oneExternalUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source365 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source235 mm
Height (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source433 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.5 kg
Other featuresidentical
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO-99, MPR-II
Technical detailsidentical
Native refresh rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons