Product comparison · 2 monitors

iiyama ProLite X3291HS computer monitor vs iiyama ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor

62specifications compared
21differ
41identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:80 cm (31.5")
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:12000000:1
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:5000000:1
Pixel pitch
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:0.363 x 0.363 mm
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
Horizontal scan range
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:30 - 80 kHz
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:24 - 80 kHz
RMS rated power
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:6 W
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:4 W
Tilt angle range
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:-3 - 21°
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:-4 - 20°
Power consumption (typical)
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:36 W
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:22 W
Power consumption (max)
- ProLite X3291HS computer monitor:55 W
- ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor:35 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X3291HS, XU2290HS-2
74 specifications	A iiyama ProLite X3291HS computer monitor Model X3291HS View product	B iiyama ProLite XU2290HS-2 computer monitor Model XU2290HS-2 View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	80 cm (31.5")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	12000000:1	5000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.363 x 0.363 mm	0.248 x 0.248 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 80 kHz	24 - 80 kHz
Display surfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Matt
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	6 W	4 W
Ports & interfacesidentical
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-3 - 21°	-4 - 20°
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	32 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	36 W	22 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	55 W	35 W
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36.3 kWh
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	737.5 mm	499.5 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	240 mm	180 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	523.5 mm	370.5 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	7 kg	3.7 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	737.5 mm	499.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	47.5 mm	44 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	435 mm	299 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.5 kg	2.92 kg
Bezel width (side)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 cm
Bezel width (top)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 cm
Bezel width (bottom)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 cm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	814 mm	566 mm
Package depthDiffers	149 mm	124 mm
Package heightDiffers	623 mm	442 mm
Package weightDiffers	12.8 kg	5.6 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, Audio (3.5mm), DVI	AC, Audio (3.5mm), DVI, HDMI, VGA
Other featuresidentical
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	TCO Certified 8, CE, TUV - Bauart, VCCI - B, PSE Green Purchasing Law 7	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO Certified, CE, TUV - Bauart, VCCI - B, PSE, Green Purchasing Law
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	85285210	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons