Product comparison · 2 monitors

iiyama ProLite P1904S-B1 vs iiyama ProLite T1930SR

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 8identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

  • Touchscreen
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:No
    • ProLite T1930SR:Yes
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:1000:1
    • ProLite T1930SR:800:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:170°
    • ProLite T1930SR:160°
  • Horizontal scan range
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:31 - 81 kHz
    • ProLite T1930SR:31 - 80 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:56 - 75 Hz
    • ProLite T1930SR:60 - 75 Hz
  • Tilt angle range
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:-5 - 20°
    • ProLite T1930SR:-5 - 90°
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:45 W
    • ProLite T1930SR:42 W
  • Weight (without stand)
    • ProLite P1904S-B1:5 kg
    • ProLite T1930SR:7.6 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ProLite P1904S-B1, ProLite T1930SR
47 specifications
Display5 differ
TouchscreenDiffersNoYes
Display brightness (typical)Known for one300 cd/m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:1800:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°160°
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31 - 81 kHz31 - 80 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 75 Hz60 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one37.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one30.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one48 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source240 cd/m²
Screen shapeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFlat
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5:4
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for oneBusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Number of upstream portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
RS-232 portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°-5 - 90°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs45 W42 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one436 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one214 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one426 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Differs5 kg7.6 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 VAC, 50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersTCO '03, CE, CB, TÜV-GS, TÜV-ERGOCE, TÜV-SUD, FCC-B, UL / C-UL, VCCI-B
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 95 / 98 / 2000 / ME / XP
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source438 x 180 x 417.5 mm
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
AMD FreeSyncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of speakersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons