Product comparison · 2 monitors

iiyama ProLite E483S 19" Silver vs LG L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV

21specifications compared
14differ
7identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:48.3 cm (19")
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:81.3 cm (32")
Display resolution
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:1280 x 1024 pixels
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:1280 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:250 cd/m²
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:500 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:500:1
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:800:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:150°
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:135°
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:178°
Horizontal scan range
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:30 - 80 kHz
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:30 - 63 kHz
Vertical scan range
- ProLite E483S 19" Silver:50 - 75 Hz
- L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV:56 - 85 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ProLite E483S 19" Silver, L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV
39 specifications	A iiyama ProLite E483S 19" Silver View product	B LG L3200TF 32" TFT 1280x768 PIP AV View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	81.3 cm (32")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1280 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	500 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	800:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	150°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	135°	178°
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.294 x 0.294 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 80 kHz	30 - 63 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	50 - 75 Hz	56 - 85 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	30.1 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	37.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Business	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CVBS, Component, S-Video, AV
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	55 W	160 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	2 W	4 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	414.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	200.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	433.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	5.6 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Differs	414.5 mm	734 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	53 mm	190 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	362.5 mm	540 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.4 kg
Other features1 differ
Audio systemKnown for one	2 x 1 W (Stereo)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	AC 100 - 240 V, 50 / 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
SafetyKnown for one	TÜV GS, FCC-B, UL / C-UL, CE, VCCI-B, CCC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power managementKnown for one	VESA DPMS, ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	TCO'99, MPR III, ISO 13406-2	TCO99

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons