Product comparison · 2 monitors

iiyama ProLite E2201W-2 vs LG L1953T computer monitor

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 19differ
  • 7identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • ProLite E2201W-2:55.9 cm (22")
    • L1953T computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • ProLite E2201W-2:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • L1953T computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • ProLite E2201W-2:16:10
    • L1953T computer monitor:5:4
  • Response time
    • ProLite E2201W-2:2 ms
    • L1953T computer monitor:5 ms
  • Aspect ratio
    • ProLite E2201W-2:16:10
    • L1953T computer monitor:5:4
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • ProLite E2201W-2:3000:1
    • L1953T computer monitor:5000:1
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • ProLite E2201W-2:160°
    • L1953T computer monitor:170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • ProLite E2201W-2:0.282 x 0.282 mm
    • L1953T computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ProLite E2201W-2, L1953T
43 specifications
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:105:4
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers2 ms5 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers16:105:4
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:15000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal170°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.282 x 0.282 mm0.294 x 0.294 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers24 - 80 kHz30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers55 - 75 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one24 - 80 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one55 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Display panel sizeKnown for one296.1 x 473.8Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for oneBusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle range5 - 20°5 - 20°
Plug and PlayYesYes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs49 W39 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs2 W1 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs507 mm402 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs209.5 mm437.2 mm
Height (without stand)Differs410.5 mm242.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5.8 kg6.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features3 differ
BandwidthDiffers0.162 GHz0.135 GHz
Power requirementsDiffersAC 100 - 240 V, 50 / 60 Hz90 - 264 Vac, 47 - 63 Hz
SafetyKnown for oneTÜV GS, FCC-B, UL / C-UL, CE, VCCI-BUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersTCO '03, TÜV-ErgonomicsTCO03, DIN-ISO 13406-2, TÜV-GS, CE, UL, CSA, SEMKO, FCC-B, VCCI-2, C-TICK
Additional accessoriesKnown for onestand, cable holderUnknown — not stated by the source
User controlsKnown for onebrightness, contrast, clock, phase, V-position, H-position, colour temperature, auto set-up, sharpness, gamma, economy mode, volume, OSD language, OSD position, OSD time out, signal select, resetUnknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source376 x 301 mm
Signal inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDVI-D, RGB
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons