Product comparison · 2 monitors

HP Compaq LA1956x vs HP x2401 computer monitor

38specifications compared
21differ
17identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- Compaq LA1956x:48.3 cm (19")
- x2401 computer monitor:61 cm (24")
Display resolution
- Compaq LA1956x:1280 x 1024 pixels
- x2401 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- Compaq LA1956x:5:4
- x2401 computer monitor:16:9
Response time
- Compaq LA1956x:5 ms
- x2401 computer monitor:12 ms
Aspect ratio
- Compaq LA1956x:5:4
- x2401 computer monitor:16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)
- Compaq LA1956x:1000:1
- x2401 computer monitor:5000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- Compaq LA1956x:1000000:1
- x2401 computer monitor:10000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- Compaq LA1956x:170°
- x2401 computer monitor:178°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Compaq LA1956x, x2401
63 specifications	A HP Compaq LA1956x View product	B HP x2401 computer monitor Model x2401 View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	61 cm (24")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	5:4	16:9
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	12 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioDiffers	5:4	16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	5000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	1000000:1	10000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.294 x 0.294 mm	0.276 x 0.276 mm
3DKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MVA
Ports & interfaces4 differ
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers	2	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	0	1
AC (power) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Ergonomics2 differ
Cable lock slotDiffers	Yes	No
SwivellingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-180 - 180°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 25°	-5 - 35°
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Power	Unknown — not stated by the source
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	27 W	28 W
Power consumption (max)Known for one	35 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	417 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	192 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	386 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	4.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Differs	417 mm	566.9 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	47 mm	130.9 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	347 mm	431.3 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.6 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	AC, USB, VGA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	EPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	TCO	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons