Product comparison · 2 monitors

HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph vs HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph

107specifications compared
23differ
84identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph has 11 ppi more pixel density than the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph (93 ppi vs 82 ppi). The HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph has 7.1 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph (59.8 cm vs 52.7 cm). The HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph has 4 cm more viewable size, vertical than the HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph (33.6 cm vs 29.6 cm). Display diagonal: 60.5 cm (23.8") on the HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph, 68.6 cm (27") on the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph. Pixel pitch: 0.2745 x 0.2745 mm on the HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph, 0.3114 x 0.3114 mm on the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph.

Display diagonal
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:60.5 cm (23.8")
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:68.6 cm (27")
Pixel pitch
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:0.2745 x 0.2745 mm
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
Pixel density
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:93 ppi
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:82 ppi
Viewable size, horizontal
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:52.7 cm
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:59.8 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:29.6 cm
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:33.6 cm
Display diagonal (metric)
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:60.5 cm
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:68.6 cm
Tilt angle range
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:-5 - 23°
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:-5 - 20°
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
- 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph:14 kWh
- 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:16 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph, 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph
113 specifications	A HP 23.8 inch FHD Monitor - 324ph View product	B HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	60.5 cm (23.8")	68.6 cm (27")
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2745 x 0.2745 mm	0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
Pixel densityDiffers	93 ppi	82 ppi
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	52.7 cm	59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	29.6 cm	33.6 cm
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	6.04 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonal (metric)Differs	60.5 cm	68.6 cm
Ports & interfacesidentical
Built-in USB hubKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 23°	-5 - 20°
Power3 differ
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	14 kWh	16 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs	23 W	27 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	35 W	40 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 65 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	538.9 mm	611 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	196.3 mm	202.3 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	469.2 mm	509.7 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	4.71 kg	5.86 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	538.9 mm	611 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	49.4 mm	57.1 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	324.2 mm	366.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.71 kg	5.86 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	595 mm	685 mm
Package depthDiffers	124 mm	141 mm
Package heightDiffers	391 mm	425 mm
Package weightDiffers	6.74 kg	8.48 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Stand includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other features1 differ
WeightDiffers	3.4 kg	4.54 kg
Low halogenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons