Product comparison · 2 monitors

HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph vs HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph

Add a product
  • 107specifications compared
  • 26differ
  • 81identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph has 20 ppi more pixel density than the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph (102 ppi vs 82 ppi). The HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph has 12.2 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph (59.8 cm vs 47.6 cm). The HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph has 6.8 cm more viewable size, vertical than the HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph (33.6 cm vs 26.8 cm). Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph, 68.6 cm (27") on the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph. Pixel pitch: 0.248 x 0.248 mm on the HP 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph, 0.3114 x 0.3114 mm on the HP 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph.

  • Display diagonal
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:54.6 cm (21.5")
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:68.6 cm (27")
  • Pixel pitch
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:0.248 x 0.248 mm
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
  • Pixel density
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:102 ppi
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:82 ppi
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:47.6 cm
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:59.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:26.8 cm
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:33.6 cm
  • Display diagonal (metric)
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:54.6 cm
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:68.6 cm
  • Tilt angle range
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:-5 - 23°
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:-5 - 20°
  • Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
    • 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph:11.3 kWh
    • 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph:16 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 21.5 inch FHD Monitor - 322ph, 27 inch FHD Monitor - 327ph
113 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")68.6 cm (27")
Pixel pitchDiffers0.248 x 0.248 mm0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
Pixel densityDiffers102 ppi82 ppi
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.6 cm59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers26.8 cm33.6 cm
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one5.46 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonal (metric)Differs54.6 cm68.6 cm
Ports & interfacesidentical
Built-in USB hubKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 23°-5 - 20°
Power4 differ
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers11.3 kWh16 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs18 W27 W
Power consumption (max)Differs25 W40 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.2 W0.3 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 65 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs488.4 mm611 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs196.4 mm202.3 mm
Height (with stand)Differs449.5 mm509.7 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs3.73 kg5.86 kg
Width (without stand)Differs488.4 mm611 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs51.2 mm57.1 mm
Height (without stand)Differs294.3 mm366.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.55 kg5.86 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers567 mm685 mm
Package depthDiffers133 mm141 mm
Package heightDiffers387 mm425 mm
Package weightDiffers5.63 kg8.48 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Stand includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other features3 differ
Country of originDiffersChina, VietnamChina, Thailand
Compliance certificatesDiffersCECP, CCC, CB, EAC, BIS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMICCC, CB, EAC, BIS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
WeightDiffers3.73 kg4.54 kg
Low halogenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons