Product comparison · 2 monitors

Hannspree Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor vs Samsung Widescreen Display

14specifications compared
9differ
5identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:43.2 cm (17")
- Widescreen Display:50.8 cm (20")
Display resolution
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- Widescreen Display:1680 x 1050 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- Widescreen Display:300 cd/m²
Response time
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:8 ms
- Widescreen Display:5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:500:1
- Widescreen Display:1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:140°
- Widescreen Display:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:130°
- Widescreen Display:160°
Power consumption (typical)
- Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor:28 W
- Widescreen Display:40 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HW173A, Widescreen Display
40 specifications	A Hannspree Hanns.G HW173A computer monitor Model HW173A View product	B Samsung Widescreen Display View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	50.8 cm (20")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	140°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	130°	160°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.255 x 0.255 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8000:1
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Composite syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	0 - 20°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	28 W	40 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width (without stand)Known for one	405 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	190 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	380 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.4 kg	5.1 kg
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	470 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	199.8 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	364.4 mm
Other featuresidentical
CertificationKnown for one	UL/CUL, TUV, CB, BSMI, FCC, CE, GOST	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	AC 100~240V, 50~60Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	469.9 x 199.9 x 364.5 mm (18.5 x 7.87 x 14.3")
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	546 x 385 x 203.9 mm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons