Product comparison · 2 monitors

GIGABYTE MO27Q2A ICE OLED vs GIGABYTE MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor

90specifications compared
28differ
62identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:68.6 cm (27")
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:80 cm (31.5")
Display resolution
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:2560 x 1440 pixels
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
HD type
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:Quad HD
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:4K Ultra HD
Display brightness (typical)
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:250 cd/m²
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:300 cd/m²
Maximum refresh rate
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:280 Hz
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:240 Hz
Pixel pitch
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:0.2292 x 0.2292 mm
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:0.1814 x 0.1814 mm
Viewable size, horizontal
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:59 cm
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:69.9 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- MO27Q2A ICE OLED:33.4 cm
- MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor:39.5 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MO27Q2A ICE OLED, MO32U24
100 specifications	A GIGABYTE MO27Q2A ICE OLED View product	B GIGABYTE MO32U24 32" OLED 4K UHD Gaming Monitor Model MO32U24 View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	80 cm (31.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1440 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
HD typeDiffers	Quad HD	4K Ultra HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	280 Hz	240 Hz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2292 x 0.2292 mm	0.1814 x 0.1814 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	59 cm	69.9 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	33.4 cm	39.5 cm
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyDiffers	DisplayHDR 400 True Black	DisplayHDR True Black 500
Performanceidentical
Low Blue Light technologyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Feet colourDiffers	White	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB upstream port typeDiffers	USB Type-A, USB Type-C	USB Type-C
Number of downstream portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Number of USB Type-C upstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DVI portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
USB hub versionKnown for one	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power4 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	E	G
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	25 kWh	33 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	28 kWh	38 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Differs	35 W	38 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	610 mm	719 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	499 mm	240 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	190 mm	610 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	6.59 kg	7.95 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	610 mm	718 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	358 mm	545 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.09 kg	6 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	860 mm	980 mm
Package depthDiffers	160 mm	168 mm
Package heightDiffers	470 mm	545 mm
Package weightDiffers	11.9 kg	11.3 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB	DisplayPort, Power
Other featuresidentical
Brand specific technologiesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black Equalizer, Crosshair

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons