Product comparison · 2 monitors

Fujitsu SCALEOVIEW L22W-9 vs Fujitsu SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 17identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

  • Vertical scan range
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:56 - 76 Hz
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:50 - 75 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:47.4 cm
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:47.3 cm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:55 W
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:33 W
  • Width (with stand)
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:515 mm
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:514 mm
  • Depth (with stand)
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:206 mm
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:220 mm
  • Height (with stand)
    • SCALEOVIEW L22W-9:415 mm
    • SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1:445 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SCALEOVIEW L22W-9, SCALEOVIEW Q22W-1
31 specifications
Display2 differ
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz50 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.4 cm47.3 cm
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs55 W33 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.7 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Differs515 mm514 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs206 mm220 mm
Height (with stand)Differs415 mm445 mm
Other featuresidentical
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 230 VAC, 50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons