Product comparison · 2 monitors

Fujitsu SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor vs Fujitsu P24W-5 ECO IPS

Add a product
  • 43specifications compared
  • 21differ
  • 22identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display brightness (typical)
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:300 cd/m²
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:400 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:5 ms
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:6 ms
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:170°
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:178°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:170°
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:178°
  • Pixel pitch
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:0.270 x 0.270 mm
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:0.27
  • RMS rated power
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:1 W
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:2 W
  • USB Type-A downstream ports quantity
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:0
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:4
  • HDCP
    • SCENICVIEW Series B24W-5 computer monitor:No
    • P24W-5 ECO IPS:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of B24W-5, P24W-5 ECO IPS
52 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonal61 cm (24")61 cm (24")
Display resolution1920 x 1200 pixels1920 x 1200 pixels
Native aspect ratio16:1016:10
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²400 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers5 ms6 ms
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
Contrast ratio (typical)1000:11000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers170°178°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.270 x 0.270 mm0.27
Viewable size diagonal61 cm61 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28 - 82 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 76 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 82 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one55 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
RMS rated powerDiffers1 W2 W
Built-in cameraNoNo
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers04
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantity11
DVI-I ports quantity00
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Headphone outputs11
HDCPDiffersNoYes
Headphone connectivityKnown for one3.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics3 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs11 cm12 cm
Swivel angle rangeDiffers-45 - 45°-180 - 180°
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°-5 - 25°
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs41 W55 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.7 W0 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Differs0.7 W0 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)5 - 35 °C5 - 35 °C
Weight & dimensions5 differ
Width (with stand)Differs565 mm566 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs212 mm217 mm
Height (with stand)431 mm431 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs9.1 kg9.8 kg
Width (without stand)565 mm565 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs83 mm85 mm
Height (without stand)378 mm378 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs6.3 kg7.1 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers11.5 kg12.3 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Display viewable area (HxV)324 x 518 mm324 x 518 mm
Power requirementsAC 100 - 240 V@50 - 60 HzAC 100 - 240 V@50 - 60 Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)70000 h70000 h
CertificationDiffersGS, CE, EN 60950, FCC Class B, cUL, C-Tick, GOST, SASO, TCO’03, ENERGY STAR 4.1, ISO13406-2, IT-Eco-Declaration, RoHS, WEEEGS, CE, EN 60950, FCC Class B, cUL, TCO’06, TCO’03, ENERGY STAR 4.1, ISO13406-2, RoHS, WEEE
Supplied AC adapter type1920 x 12001920 x 1200

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons