All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

EIZO FlexScan® 19 inch LCD vs Philips 150B4AS 15"TFT .29 60kHz 1024x768 TCO03

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 3identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 48.3 cm (19")
    • 38.1 cm (15")
  • Display resolution
    • 1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 1024 x 768 pixels
  • Response time
    • 25 ms
    • 30 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 1000:1
    • 400:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 178°
    • 150°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 178°
    • 110°
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.294 x 0.294 mm
    • 0.297
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 30 - 82 kHz
    • 30 - 61 kHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
47 specifications
A

EIZO

FlexScan® 19 inch LCDView product
B

Philips

150B4AS 15"TFT .29 60kHz 1024x768 TCO03View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers48.3 cm (19")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)250 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers25 ms30 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:1400:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers178°150°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers178°110°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.294 x 0.294 mm0.297
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 82 kHz30 - 61 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers46 - 86 Hz56 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one30.4 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one22.8 cm
Surface treatmentKnown for oneAnti-glare polarizer, hard coated
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million colours
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one48.1 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one30 - 65 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one59 - 61 Hz
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneConnections on monitor body - Video 15-pin D-sub (analog) connector - DC output 12V, 6.5mm DC connector - Power IEC/CEE-22 type male power inlet
USB hub versionKnown for one2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one3
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayYesYes
Display tilt and swivel rangeKnown for oneTilt -5°-25°
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one35
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one30
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs50 W18 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one2 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs404 mm343 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs60 mm218 mm
Height (without stand)Differs333 mm319 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one6.8 kg
Weight (without stand)Known for one4.8 kg
Other features3 differ
CompatibilityKnown for oneMicrosoftWindows 95/98/ Me & 2000/ XP
Audio systemKnown for oneLoudspeaker 1W/channel RMS x2
BandwidthKnown for one0.08 GHz
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs376 x 301 mm304.1 x 228.1 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one640 x 480 35.0 67
Video inKnown for oneAnalog (D-Sub) input
Power managementDiffersVESA DPMS, DVI-DMPM, EIZO MPMSComplies with EPA Energy Star and NUTEK specifications
CertificationDiffersCE, TÜV GS, TÜV Ergonomics, ISO 13406-2,TCO’03Regulatory approvals: • TÜV/GS,TÜV-Ergo • FCC-B, UL, CSA • SEMKO • prEN50279 Low Emission • CE Mark • Maximum 1024x768 at 75Hz • NUTEK, Energy Star • TCO ‘03
Speakers and microphoneKnown for oneLoudspeaker
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneLCD, 1024 x 768 at 60Hz
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneGrey
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons