Product comparison · 2 monitors

EIZO CG303W computer monitor vs HP x22LED computer monitor

24specifications compared
18differ
6identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- CG303W computer monitor:75.7 cm (29.8")
- x22LED computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolution
- CG303W computer monitor:2560 x 1600 pixels
- x22LED computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- CG303W computer monitor:260 cd/m²
- x22LED computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Response time
- CG303W computer monitor:12 ms
- x22LED computer monitor:5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- CG303W computer monitor:850:1
- x22LED computer monitor:1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- CG303W computer monitor:178°
- x22LED computer monitor:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- CG303W computer monitor:178°
- x22LED computer monitor:160°
Pixel pitch
- CG303W computer monitor:0.2505 x 0.2505 mm
- x22LED computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CG303W, x22LED
43 specifications	A EIZO CG303W computer monitor Model CG303W View product	B HP x22LED computer monitor Model x22LED View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	75.7 cm (29.8")	54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Display brightness (typical)Differs	260 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	12 ms	5 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	850:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2505 x 0.2505 mm	0.248 x 0.248 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 - 75 Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54.6 cm
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Graphics design	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers	3	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	2	1
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-4 - 13°
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	170 W	30 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 60 °C
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	689 mm	525 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	90 mm	165 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	450 mm	376 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	689 mm	525 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	90 mm	38 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	450 mm	331 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	11.1 kg	2.9 kg
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC, C-Tick, VCCI, BSMI, CB, TUV-BAUART, TUV-S, ISO9241-307, CSA, CCC, CEL, CSC, Microsoft Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons