Product comparison · 2 monitors

EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024 vs NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 3identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 has 130 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024 (300 cd/m² vs 170 cd/m²). The EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024 has 5 ms more response time than the NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 (45 ms vs 40 ms). The NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 has 150 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024 (450:1 vs 300:1). Display diagonal: 46 cm (18.1") on the EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024, 38.1 cm (15") on the NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the EIZO 18IN 28MM 1280X1024, 1024 x 768 pixels on the NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099.

  • Display diagonal
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:46 cm (18.1")
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:38.1 cm (15")
  • Display resolution
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:1024 x 768 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:170 cd/m²
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:45 ms
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:40 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:300:1
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:450:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:140°
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:120°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:140°
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:100°
  • Pixel pitch
    • 18IN 28MM 1280X1024:0.28
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:0.297

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 18IN 28MM 1280X1024, LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099
28 specifications
Display12 differ
Display diagonalDiffers46 cm (18.1")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs170 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers45 ms40 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs300:1450:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers140°120°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers140°100°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.280.297
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers27 - 82 kHz31 - 60 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 85 Hz56.2 - 75.1 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers35.9 cm30.4 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers28.7 cm22.8 cm
Surface treatmentKnown for oneClearTek 3000; a protective glass overcoat that protects the sensor by resisting scratches and increasing durabilityUnknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one2 x D-Sub mini 15 pin, USB 1.1: 1 x upstream port, 4 x downstream portsUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one47 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs430 mm345.2 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs218 mm162 mm
Height (without stand)Differs455 mm362.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.5 kg
Other features2 differ
Audio systemDiffersNoMultimedia: 1-Watt Speaker; headphone jack
Power requirementsKnown for one100-120/220-240V, 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersTÜV/GS, c-Tick, CE, CB, UL 1950, CSA C22.2 No.950, FCC-A, Canadian ICES-003-A, TÜV/S, VCCI-A, EPA ENERGY STAR ProgramCE; TÜV GS; TÜV ERGONOMIE; UL/C-UL; FCC Class B; ISO 13406; TCO 99;MPR II; Ctick; PCBC/B-Mark; EnergyStar; Energy 2000
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 80%
Maximum operating temperature range (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 35 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons