All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ vs Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 4identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ has 29 ms more response time than the Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE (45 ms vs 16 ms). The Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE has 9.1 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ (40.8 cm vs 31.7 cm). The Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE has 5.3 cm more viewable size, vertical than the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ (30.6 cm vs 25.3 cm). Display diagonal: 40.6 cm (16") on the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ, 51 cm (20.1") on the Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ, 1600 x 1200 pixels on the Philips 20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGE.

  • Display diagonal
    • 40.6 cm (16")
    • 51 cm (20.1")
  • Display resolution
    • 1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 1600 x 1200 pixels
  • Response time
    • 45 ms
    • 16 ms
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.248
    • 0.255 x 0.255 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 24.8 - 80 kHz
    • 30 - 94 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • 50 - 75 Hz
    • 56 - 85 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 31.7 cm
    • 40.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 25.3 cm
    • 30.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
27 specifications
A

EIZO

16IN 1280X1024 75HZView product
B

Philips

20INCH TFT MONITOR 1600X1200 TCO-03 BASIC BASE BEIGEView product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers40.6 cm (16")51 cm (20.1")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1600 x 1200 pixels
Response timeDiffers45 ms16 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one160°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one130°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2480.255 x 0.255 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers24.8 - 80 kHz30 - 94 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 75 Hz56 - 85 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers31.7 cm40.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers25.3 cm30.6 cm
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneD-Sub mini 15 pin, DVI-D 24 pin, audio in, audio out
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs45 W50 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs370 mm488 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs157 mm220 mm
Height (without stand)Differs398 mm459 mm
Packaging content1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffersDrivers & UtilitiesMicrosoft Windows 95/98/ Me & 2000/XP compatible
Other features2 differ
Audio systemDiffers2 x 1W RMS speakers – integratedLoudspeaker 2Wx2 RMS, 200Hz-12KHz,4 ohm,THD=10%/ Input signal connector 3.5mm mini jack / Headphone out signal level 20mW x2, 32Ω /
Power requirementsKnown for one110-120/220-240V, 50/60Hz
CertificationDiffersTCO95, TUV/Ergonomics (including ISO 13406-2 and MPR-III), TUV/GS, c-Tick, CE, CB, UL 1950, CSA C22.2 No.950, FCC-B, Canadian ICES-003-B, TUV/S, VCCI-B, EPA ENERGY STAR, Energy 2000• TÜV/GS,TÜV-Ergo • FCC-B, UL, CSA • SEMKO • MPR-II Low Emission • CE Mark • NUTEK, Energy Star • TCO ’03
Video inKnown for oneD-Sub (analog), DVI-D (digital)
Power managementKnown for oneComplies with EPA Energy Star and NUTEK specifications / Typical operation 65W (maximum audio volume) 50W (zero audio volume) / Sleep mode 1.5W (typ.).
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%
Maximum operating temperature range (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons