Product comparison · 2 monitors

EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ vs Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 3identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ has 20 ms more response time than the Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR (45 ms vs 25 ms). The Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR has 300 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ (700:1 vs 400:1). Display diagonal: 40.6 cm (16") on the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ, 48.3 cm (19") on the Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR. Horizontal scan range: 24.8 - 80 kHz on the EIZO 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ, 30 - 82 kHz on the Fujitsu C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR.

  • Display diagonal
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:40.6 cm (16")
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:250 cd/m²
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:45 ms
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:25 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:400:1
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:700:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:160°
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:130°
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:170°
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:24.8 - 80 kHz
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:30 - 82 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ:50 - 75 Hz
    • C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR:50 - 76 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 16IN 1280X1024 75HZ, C19-1 19 INCH TFT MONITOR
27 specifications
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers40.6 cm (16")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution1280 x 1024 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers45 ms25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs400:1700:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers130°170°
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.248Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers24.8 - 80 kHz30 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 75 Hz50 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers31.7 cm37.6 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers25.3 cm30.1 cm
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneD-Sub mini 15 pin, DVI-D 24 pin, audio in, audio outUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayYesYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one45 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs370 mm422 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs157 mm214 mm
Height (without stand)Differs398 mm451 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.9 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffersDrivers & UtilitiesPivotPro software
Other features2 differ
Audio systemDiffers2 x 1W RMS speakers – integratedIntegrated / digital / 3,5 mm stereo phone jack / 1,5 W (L) + 1,5 W (R).
Power requirementsKnown for one110-120/220-240V, 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersTCO95, TUV/Ergonomics (including ISO 13406-2 and MPR-III), TUV/GS, c-Tick, CE, CB, UL 1950, CSA C22.2 No.950, FCC-B, Canadian ICES-003-B, TUV/S, VCCI-B, EPA ENERGY STAR, Energy 2000Product safety EN60950 CB UL1950 CSA 22.2 No.950 Ergonomics GS mark ISO 13406-2 (pixel faults class II) Radiation immunity and CE certification according RFI suppression to EC Directive 89/336/EEC (EN55022/B, EN50024, 61000-3-2/-3); MPR II, TCO’99
Security featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington Lock prepared
Video inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceD-SUB 15-pin
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons