Product comparison · 2 monitors

Dell UltraSharp 2009W vs LG W2353V computer monitor

18specifications compared
9differ
9identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- UltraSharp 2009W:50.8 cm (20")
- W2353V computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- UltraSharp 2009W:1680 x 1050 pixels
- W2353V computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Response time
- UltraSharp 2009W:5 ms
- W2353V computer monitor:2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- UltraSharp 2009W:2000:1
- W2353V computer monitor:1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- UltraSharp 2009W:170°
- W2353V computer monitor:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- UltraSharp 2009W:160°
- W2353V computer monitor:170°
Pixel pitch
- UltraSharp 2009W:0.258 x 0.258 mm
- W2353V computer monitor:0.266 x 0.266 mm
Product colour
- UltraSharp 2009W:Silver
- W2353V computer monitor:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of UltraSharp 2009W, W2353V
44 specifications	A Dell UltraSharp 2009W View product	B LG W2353V computer monitor Model W2353V View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	1680 x 1050 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)	300 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	2000:1	1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	170°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.258 x 0.258 mm	0.266 x 0.266 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	43.3 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	27.1 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000:1
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	sRGB
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Built-in camera	No	No
Design1 differ
Market positioningKnown for one	Business	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Silver	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
HDCP	Yes	Yes
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	42 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one	70 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	472.9 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	183.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	333.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.13 kg	4.29 kg
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.5 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	8.08 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Power requirementsKnown for one	AC 120/230 V ( 50/60 Hz )	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter type	LCD	LCD
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL (cUL), TUV-Type, SEMKO, UL
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PWR D-Sub DVI-D
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC-B, CE
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons