Product comparison · 2 monitors

Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP vs Dell UltraSharp 2007FP

29specifications compared
12differ
17identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell UltraSharp 2007FP has 11 ms more response time than the Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP (16 ms vs 5 ms). The Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP has 71° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Dell UltraSharp 2007FP (160° vs 89°). The Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP has 71° more viewing angle, vertical than the Dell UltraSharp 2007FP (160° vs 89°). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP, 51 cm (20.1") on the Dell UltraSharp 2007FP. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP, 1600 x 1200 pixels on the Dell UltraSharp 2007FP.

Display diagonal
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:48.3 cm (19")
- UltraSharp 2007FP:51 cm (20.1")
Display resolution
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:1280 x 1024 pixels
- UltraSharp 2007FP:1600 x 1200 pixels
Response time
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:5 ms
- UltraSharp 2007FP:16 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:160°
- UltraSharp 2007FP:89°
Viewing angle, vertical
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:160°
- UltraSharp 2007FP:89°
Pixel pitch
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:0.294 x 0.294 mm
- UltraSharp 2007FP:0.255 x 0.255 mm
Power consumption (typical)
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:30 W
- UltraSharp 2007FP:55 W
Power consumption (max)
- Ultrasharp 1908FP:60 W
- UltraSharp 2007FP:75 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Ultrasharp 1908FP, UltraSharp 2007FP
45 specifications	A Dell Ultrasharp 1908FP View product	B Dell UltraSharp 2007FP View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	51 cm (20.1")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1600 x 1200 pixels
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	16 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	89°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	89°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.294 x 0.294 mm	0.255 x 0.255 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30.6 cm
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	30 W	55 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	60 W	75 W
Input currentDiffers	1.5 A	2 A
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	410.5 mm	445.3 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.74 kg	6.9 kg
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	193.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	547.6 mm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsDiffers	100 - 240 VAX/50-60 Hz+- 3 Hz/2.0A (Max.)	AC 120/230 V ( 50/60 Hz )
CertificationKnown for one	TCO '99 EPEAT Silver	Unknown — not stated by the source
Set depth (with stand) (inch)Known for one	18.2 cm (7.17")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Set height (with stand) (inch)Known for one	36.3 cm (14.3")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.6 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons