Product comparison · 2 monitors

Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor vs Dell E193FP computer monitor

32specifications compared
21differ
11identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:61 cm (24")
- E193FP computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:1920 x 1200 pixels
- E193FP computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:500 cd/m²
- E193FP computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Response time
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:12 ms
- E193FP computer monitor:16 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:1000:1
- E193FP computer monitor:500:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:178°
- E193FP computer monitor:140°
Viewing angle, vertical
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:178°
- E193FP computer monitor:140°
Pixel pitch
- UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor:0.270 x 0.270 mm
- E193FP computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 2405FPW, E193FP
51 specifications	A Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW computer monitor Model 2405FPW View product	B Dell E193FP computer monitor Model E193FP View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	61 cm (24")	48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1200 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	500 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	12 ms	16 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	140°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	140°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.270 x 0.270 mm	0.294 x 0.294 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 81 kHz	30 - 82 kHz
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers	4	0
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Stand-by	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs	80 W	40 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	59 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 - 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one	2 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 80%
Operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 3658 m
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	559.4 mm	424 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	229 mm	160 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	642.7 mm	444 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	10 kg	6.5 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	559.4 mm	424 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	229 mm	64 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	546.8 mm	360 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	7 kg	4.7 kg
Stand weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	13.2 kg	7.8 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Energy Star

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons