Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2 vs Samsung SyncMaster 910T

18specifications compared
11differ
7identical
13known for one product only

Key differences

The BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2 has 8 ms more response time than the Samsung SyncMaster 910T (16 ms vs 8 ms). The Samsung SyncMaster 910T has 200 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2 (700:1 vs 500:1). The Samsung SyncMaster 910T has 0.03 more pixel pitch than the BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2 (0.294 vs 0.264). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung SyncMaster 910T. Horizontal scan range: 81 on the BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2, 30 - 81 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 910T.

Display diagonal
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:43.2 cm (17")
- SyncMaster 910T:48.3 cm (19")
Response time
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:16 ms
- SyncMaster 910T:8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:500:1
- SyncMaster 910T:700:1
Pixel pitch
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:0.264
- SyncMaster 910T:0.294
Horizontal scan range
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:81
- SyncMaster 910T:30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan range
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:76
- SyncMaster 910T:56 - 75 Hz
Power consumption (typical)
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:50 W
- SyncMaster 910T:38 W
Width (without stand)
- LCD Monitor FP767 v2:382 mm
- SyncMaster 910T:417 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LCD Monitor FP767 v2, SyncMaster 910T
31 specifications	A BenQ LCD Monitor FP767 v2 View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 910T View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	48.3 cm (19")
Response timeDiffers	16 ms	8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	700:1
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.264	0.294
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	81	30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	76	56 - 75 Hz
Pixel frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 MHz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	33.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	27 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Silver
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA 15-pin D-Sub
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	50 W	38 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	382 mm	417 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	404 mm	216 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	200 mm	425 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.4 kg	6 kg
Other featuresidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO’03
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Audio systemKnown for one	stereo speakers	Unknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for one	0.135 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons