Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ GL2030M computer monitor vs Viewsonic A Series VA2232w computer monitor

25specifications compared
13differ
12identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- GL2030M computer monitor:50.8 cm (20")
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- GL2030M computer monitor:1600 x 900 pixels
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- GL2030M computer monitor:4:3
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:16:10
Display brightness (typical)
- GL2030M computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:300 cd/m²
Aspect ratio
- GL2030M computer monitor:4:3
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:16:10
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- GL2030M computer monitor:12000000:1
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:100000:1
Pixel pitch
- GL2030M computer monitor:0.276 x 0.276 mm
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
DVI-D ports quantity
- GL2030M computer monitor:1
- A Series VA2232w computer monitor:0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GL2030M, VA2232w
43 specifications	A BenQ GL2030M computer monitor Model GL2030M View product	B Viewsonic A Series VA2232w computer monitor Model VA2232w View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	4:3	16:10
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers	4:3	16:10
Contrast ratio (typical)	1000:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	12000000:1	100000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal	170°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.276 x 0.276 mm	0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	50 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel frequencyKnown for one	165 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in camera	No	No
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCP	No	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle range	-5 - 20°	-5 - 20°
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	27 W	45 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	492 mm	510 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	159.8 mm	195.4 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	364 mm	416.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	2.95 kg	4.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	442.8 x 249.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CB, WEEE, RoHS, REACH SVHC List, CE, Nemko ERGO, GOST-R+Hygienic, UkrSEPRO BSMI, PSB, C-TICK, KC, SASO
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons