Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ G900WAD computer monitor vs LG L1942H computer monitor

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 9identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display resolution
    • G900WAD computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
    • L1942H computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • G900WAD computer monitor:800:1
    • L1942H computer monitor:1000:1
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • G900WAD computer monitor:2000:1
    • L1942H computer monitor:8000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • G900WAD computer monitor:160°
    • L1942H computer monitor:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • G900WAD computer monitor:160°
    • L1942H computer monitor:170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • G900WAD computer monitor:0.283 x 0.283 mm
    • L1942H computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • G900WAD computer monitor:31 - 83 kHz
    • L1942H computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • G900WAD computer monitor:55 - 76 Hz
    • L1942H computer monitor:56 - 75 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of G900WAD, L1942H
45 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonal48.3 cm (19")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1440 x 900 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5:4
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5:4
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs800:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs2000:18000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.283 x 0.283 mm0.294 x 0.294 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31 - 83 kHz30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers55 - 76 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Colour gamut standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcesRGB
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°5 - 20°
Plug and PlayYesYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStand-by
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs40 W33 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source407 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source419.7 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source237 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 kg
Width (without stand)Differs441.3 mm407 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs365.7 mm345 mm
Height (without stand)Differs165 mm58.4 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one3.73 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 – 264 Vac, 47 – 63 Hz
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDDCCI
CertificationDiffersTCO'03TCO03, DIN-ISO 13406-2, TÜV-GS, CE, UL, CSA, SEMKO, FCC-B, VCCI-2, C-TICK, EPA
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
BandwidthKnown for one0.135 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one408.2 x 255.1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons