Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ G900WAD computer monitor vs Lenovo ThinkVison L171p

20specifications compared
12differ
8identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- G900WAD computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- ThinkVison L171p:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- G900WAD computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- ThinkVison L171p:1280 x 1024 pixels
Response time
- G900WAD computer monitor:5 ms
- ThinkVison L171p:8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- G900WAD computer monitor:800:1
- ThinkVison L171p:500:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- G900WAD computer monitor:160°
- ThinkVison L171p:140°
Viewing angle, vertical
- G900WAD computer monitor:160°
- ThinkVison L171p:130°
Pixel pitch
- G900WAD computer monitor:0.283 x 0.283 mm
- ThinkVison L171p:0.264 x 0.264 mm
Horizontal scan range
- G900WAD computer monitor:31 - 83 kHz
- ThinkVison L171p:30 - 81 kHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of G900WAD, ThinkVison L171p
47 specifications	A BenQ G900WAD computer monitor Model G900WAD View product	B Lenovo ThinkVison L171p View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	800:1	500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	140°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	130°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.283 x 0.283 mm	0.264 x 0.264 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	31 - 83 kHz	30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	55 - 76 Hz	56 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.9 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27.2 cm
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	43.2 cm
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	2000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2000
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Business
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Adjustable height (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11 cm
PivotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-45 - 45°
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 20°	0 - 30°
ErgonomicsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO 13406-2
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	40 W	35 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	371 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	212 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	439 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.73 kg	5.4 kg
Width (without stand)Known for one	441.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	365.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	165 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
BandwidthKnown for one	0.135 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	408.2 x 255.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons