Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ G2400WAD computer monitor vs Samsung Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor

16specifications compared
7differ
9identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display brightness (typical)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:400 cd/m²
Response time
- G2400WAD computer monitor:2 ms
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:5 ms
Power consumption (typical)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:55 W
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:100 W
Width (without stand)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:558 mm
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:565 mm
Depth (without stand)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:170.5 mm
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:389 mm
Height (without stand)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:442.7 mm
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:81 mm
Weight (without stand)
- G2400WAD computer monitor:6.15 kg
- Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor:8.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of G2400WAD, Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor
37 specifications	A BenQ G2400WAD computer monitor Model G2400WAD View product	B Samsung Kilimanjaro 24" LCD monitor View product
Display2 differ
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	400 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	2 ms	5 ms
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.27 x 0.27 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	31 - 94 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 85 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel frequencyKnown for one	135 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	-5 - 20°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stand-by
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	55 W	100 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	558 mm	565 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	170.5 mm	389 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	442.7 mm	81 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	6.15 kg	8.5 kg
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	565 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	447.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 mm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	518.5 x 324 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Built-in	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	TCO'03	Unknown — not stated by the source
Subwoofer RMS powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 W
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons