Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ G2210W computer monitor vs EIZO S2233 computer monitor

24specifications compared
15differ
9identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display brightness (typical)
- G2210W computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- S2233 computer monitor:350 cd/m²
Response time
- G2210W computer monitor:5 ms
- S2233 computer monitor:6 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- G2210W computer monitor:1000:1
- S2233 computer monitor:1200:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- G2210W computer monitor:160°
- S2233 computer monitor:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- G2210W computer monitor:160°
- S2233 computer monitor:178°
Built-in speaker(s)
- G2210W computer monitor:No
- S2233 computer monitor:Yes
Product colour
- G2210W computer monitor:Black
- S2233 computer monitor:Grey
Power consumption (typical)
- G2210W computer monitor:45 W
- S2233 computer monitor:32 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of G2210W, S2233
45 specifications	A BenQ G2210W computer monitor Model G2210W View product	B EIZO S2233 computer monitor Model S2233 View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonal	55.9 cm (22")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution	1680 x 1050 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	6 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	1200:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	30000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	160°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Pixel pitch	0.282 x 0.282 mm	0.282 x 0.282 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	31 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	56 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	sRGB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	No	Yes
Built-in camera	No	No
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
HDCP	Yes	Yes
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	-5 - 20°	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Stand-by	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	45 W	32 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	512.2 mm	511 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	60.4 mm	208.5 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	348.7 mm	521 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	512.2 mm	511 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	163.4 mm	85 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	401.6 mm	333 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.3 kg	6.6 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	6.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integrated	No	No
BandwidthKnown for one	135 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	473.7 x 296.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons