Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ FP92W computer monitor vs Lenovo L200p 20.1

15specifications compared
14differ
1identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- FP92W computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- L200p 20.1:51 cm (20.1")
Display resolution
- FP92W computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- L200p 20.1:1600 x 1200 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- FP92W computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- L200p 20.1:250 cd/m²
Response time
- FP92W computer monitor:5 ms
- L200p 20.1:25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- FP92W computer monitor:700:1
- L200p 20.1:400:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- FP92W computer monitor:150°
- L200p 20.1:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- FP92W computer monitor:140°
- L200p 20.1:176°
Pixel pitch
- FP92W computer monitor:0.2835
- L200p 20.1:0.255

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FP92W, L200p 20.1
34 specifications	A BenQ FP92W computer monitor Model FP92W View product	B Lenovo L200p 20.1 View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	51 cm (20.1")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1600 x 1200 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	700:1	400:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	150°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	140°	176°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2835	0.255
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	31 - 81 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Business
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 x 15-pin D-Sub 1 x DVI-I
Ergonomicsidentical
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ErgonomicsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO 13406 Part 2
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	45 W	65 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 80%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	365.6 mm	468 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	450.2 mm	252 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	169.9 mm	470 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.7 kg	9.5 kg
Other features1 differ
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Microsoft Windows NT 4.0/Windows ME/Windows 2000/Windows XP
Security featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington lock compatible
Power managementDiffers	TCO03	ENERGY STAR
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO-99, MPR-III
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	408.2 x 255.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons