Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ FP92W computer monitor vs Lenovo L150 15"

14specifications compared
13differ
1identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- FP92W computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- L150 15":38.1 cm (15")
Display resolution
- FP92W computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- L150 15":1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- FP92W computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- L150 15":250 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- FP92W computer monitor:700:1
- L150 15":400:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- FP92W computer monitor:150°
- L150 15":160°
Viewing angle, vertical
- FP92W computer monitor:140°
- L150 15":115°
Pixel pitch
- FP92W computer monitor:0.2835
- L150 15":0.297
Power consumption (typical)
- FP92W computer monitor:45 W
- L150 15":30 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FP92W, L150 15"
35 specifications	A BenQ FP92W computer monitor Model FP92W View product	B Lenovo L150 15"View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	700:1	400:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	150°	160°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	140°	115°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2835	0.297
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 61 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30.4 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22.8 cm
Response timeKnown for one	5 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	31 - 81 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Business
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ErgonomicsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISO 13406 Part 2
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	45 W	30 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 80%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	365.6 mm	363 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	450.2 mm	214 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	169.9 mm	370 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.7 kg	4.8 kg
Other features1 differ
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-Microsoft Windows ME -Microsoft Windows 2000 -Microsoft Windows XP
Power managementDiffers	TCO03	ENERGY STAR
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO-99
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	408.2 x 255.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons