Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ FP92W 19" TFT vs Philips LCD monitor 170V7FB/05

18specifications compared
13differ
5identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- FP92W 19" TFT:48.3 cm (19")
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- FP92W 19" TFT:1440 x 900 pixels
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- FP92W 19" TFT:300 cd/m²
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:270 cd/m²
Response time
- FP92W 19" TFT:5 ms
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- FP92W 19" TFT:700:1
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:500:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- FP92W 19" TFT:150°
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:160°
Viewing angle, vertical
- FP92W 19" TFT:140°
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:145°
Pixel pitch
- FP92W 19" TFT:0.2835
- LCD monitor 170V7FB/05:0.264 x 0.264 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FP92W 19" TFT, 170V7FB/05
43 specifications	A BenQ FP92W 19" TFT View product	B Philips LCD monitor 170V7FB/05 Model 170V7FB/05 View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	700:1	500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	150°	160°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	140°	145°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2835	0.264 x 0.264 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 76 Hz
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	31 - 81 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 25°
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	45 W	30 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	380 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	387 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.7 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	365.6 mm	380 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	450.2 mm	57.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	169.9 mm	327 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	4.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	449 x 182 x 489 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.1 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA
Other features1 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs	408.2 x 255.1 mm	337.9 x 270.3 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 h
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE Mark, EMC, Energy Star, FCC-B, UL, CSA, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
Power managementKnown for one	TCO03	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons