Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ FP91GX computer monitor vs Samsung 19" LCD monitor

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 4identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display resolution
    • FP91GX computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 19" LCD monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • FP91GX computer monitor:270 cd/m²
    • 19" LCD monitor:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • FP91GX computer monitor:8 ms
    • 19" LCD monitor:5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • FP91GX computer monitor:550:1
    • 19" LCD monitor:1000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • FP91GX computer monitor:140°
    • 19" LCD monitor:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • FP91GX computer monitor:135°
    • 19" LCD monitor:160°
  • Panel mounting interface
    • FP91GX computer monitor:100 x 100 mm
    • 19" LCD monitor:75 x 75 mm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • FP91GX computer monitor:40 W
    • 19" LCD monitor:34 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FP91GX, 19" LCD monitor
41 specifications
Display6 differ
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1440 x 900 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs270 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs550:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers140°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers135°160°
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.294 x 0.294 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one31 - 81 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one56 - 76 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 W
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
Headphone outputsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Microphone inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite video inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
I/O portsKnown for one1 x VGA - 15 pin HD D-Sub (HD-15) 1 x DVI-D - 24 pin DVIUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers100 x 100 mm75 x 75 mm
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs40 W34 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs2 W1 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source448 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source188.7 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source385.9 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.4 kg
Width (without stand)Differs410 mm448 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs168 mm61.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs422 mm335.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one5.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source521 x 415 x 132 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
Power requirementsKnown for oneAC 120/230 VUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneTCO '03, FCC Class B certified, CE, TUV GS, VCCI, GOST, FIMKO, ISO 13406-2, TCO '99, CB, CCC, TUV Ergo, TCO '03, FCC Class B certified, CE, CSA, TUV GS, VCCI, C-Tick, BSMI, GOST, FIMKO, ISO 13406-2, TCO '99, CB, CCC, TUV Ergo, EPA Energy Star 4.0Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons