Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ FP72E computer monitor vs LG 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03

20specifications compared
8differ
12identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

Response time
- FP72E computer monitor:8 ms
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:4 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- FP72E computer monitor:500:1
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:2000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- FP72E computer monitor:140°
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:160°
Viewing angle, vertical
- FP72E computer monitor:130°
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:160°
Horizontal scan range
- FP72E computer monitor:31 - 81 kHz
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan range
- FP72E computer monitor:56 - 76 Hz
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:56 - 75 Hz
Power consumption (typical)
- FP72E computer monitor:45 W
- 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03:35 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FP72E, 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03
49 specifications	A BenQ FP72E computer monitor Model FP72E View product	B LG 17" TFT Ultra Slim TCO03 View product
Display6 differ
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4:3
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	4 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4:3
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	2000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	140°	160°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	130°	160°
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	31 - 81 kHz	30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 76 Hz	56 - 75 Hz
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.264	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
RMS rated powerKnown for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Silver
Ports & interfacesidentical
Microphone inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
PivotKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	45 W	35 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	369.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	314.7 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.3 kg
Width (with stand)Known for one	456 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one	116 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one	423 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand)Known for one	3.9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	452 x 133 x 386 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.8 kg
Other features1 differ
Built-in subwooferKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
TV tuner integratedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 - 264 Vac (47 - 63 Hz)
Power managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EPA Energy Star
CertificationDiffers	TCO'03	TCO-03, UL, CUL, TUV-GS, SEMCO, FCC-B, CE
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	60000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons