Product comparison · 2 monitors

BenQ E900 computer monitor vs LG W2252TE-PF computer monitor

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 8identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • E900 computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
  • Display resolution
    • E900 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • E900 computer monitor:300 cd/m²
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:250 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • E900 computer monitor:5 ms
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:2 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • E900 computer monitor:800:1
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:1000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • E900 computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • E900 computer monitor:31 - 83 kHz
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • E900 computer monitor:55 - 76 Hz
    • W2252TE-PF computer monitor:56 - 75 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of E900, W2252TE-PF
49 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers48.3 cm (19")55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers5 ms2 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs800:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.294 x 0.294 mm0.282 x 0.282 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31 - 83 kHz30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers55 - 76 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)DiffersYesNo
RMS rated powerKnown for one2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°5 - 20°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStand-by
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
ErgonomicsKnown for oneTCO03Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs40 W22 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.3 W
Weight & dimensions6 differ
Width (with stand)Differs424.5 mm519 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs178 mm220.9 mm
Height (with stand)Differs416 mm429.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.4 kg
Width (without stand)Differs416 mm519 mm
Height (without stand)Differs374.5 mm371.6 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.67 kg4 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source582 x 449 x 127 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.2 kg
Other features1 differ
TV tuner integratedDiffersYesNo
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100~240V
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDDC2B
BandwidthKnown for one0.135 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one376.3 x 301 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneVGAUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STARUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons