Product comparison · 2 monitors

ASUS VW227D computer monitor vs BenQ BL2201M computer monitor

25specifications compared
14differ
11identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- VW227D computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
- BL2201M computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- VW227D computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- BL2201M computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- VW227D computer monitor:16:9
- BL2201M computer monitor:16:10
Aspect ratio
- VW227D computer monitor:16:9
- BL2201M computer monitor:16:10
Pixel pitch
- VW227D computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
- BL2201M computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
HDCP
- VW227D computer monitor:No
- BL2201M computer monitor:Yes
Cable lock slot
- VW227D computer monitor:Yes
- BL2201M computer monitor:No
Tilt angle range
- VW227D computer monitor:20 - -5°
- BL2201M computer monitor:-5 - 20°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VW227D, BL2201M
46 specifications	A ASUS VW227D computer monitor Model VW227D View product	B BenQ BL2201M computer monitor Model BL2201M View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	54.6 cm (21.5")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)	250 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal	170°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.248 x 0.248 mm	0.282 x 0.282 mm
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Composite syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 85 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	55 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Built-in camera	No	No
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity	0	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Microphone inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDCPDiffers	No	Yes
AC (power) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomics2 differ
Panel mounting interface	100 x 100 mm	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotDiffers	Yes	No
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	20 - -5°	-5 - 20°
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	25 W	34.5 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	1 W	0.3 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	515 mm	516.7 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	200.4 mm	190.8 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	387.5 mm	429.9 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4 kg	4.3 g
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 - 264 V
CertificationKnown for one	UL/cUL, CB, EuP, FCC, CCC, BSMI, Gost-R, C-Tick, VCCI, J-MOSS, TUV/GS, TCO Display 5.1, HF, WEEE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	600 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	440 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons