Product comparison · 2 monitors

ASUS VP278QG computer monitor vs Viewsonic X Series XG2702 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 58specifications compared
  • 27differ
  • 31identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display technology
    • VP278QG computer monitor:LED
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:LCD
  • Panel type
    • VP278QG computer monitor:TN
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:TFT
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • VP278QG computer monitor:300 cd/m²
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:400 cd/m²
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • VP278QG computer monitor:1200:1
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:1000:1
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • VP278QG computer monitor:100000000:1
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:120000000:1
  • RMS rated power
    • VP278QG computer monitor:4 W
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:3 W
  • Built-in USB hub
    • VP278QG computer monitor:No
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:Yes
  • Cable lock slot
    • VP278QG computer monitor:Yes
    • X Series XG2702 computer monitor:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of VP278QG, XG2702
94 specifications
Display6 differ
Display technologyDiffersLEDLCD
Panel typeDiffersTNTFT
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²400 cd/m²
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers640 x 350, 640 x 480 (VGA), 720 x 400, 832 x 624, 848 x 480, 1024 x 768 (XGA), 1152 x 864 (XGA+), 1280 x 720 (HD 720), 1280 x 768 (WXGA), 1280 x 800 (WXGA), 1280 x 960, 1366 x 768, 1440 x 900 (WXGA+), 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1200:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs100000000:1120000000:1
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one24 - 83 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one48 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:9
Maximum refresh rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source144 Hz
Performanceidentical
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for oneFreeSyncUnknown — not stated by the source
Game modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers4 W3 W
Designidentical
Feet colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Built-in USB hubDiffersNoYes
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB upstream port typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-B
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Audio outputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomics3 differ
Cable lock slotDiffersYesNo
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Height adjustmentDiffersNoYes
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°-5 - 15°
Adjustable height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 cm
PivotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Pivot angleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 90°
Swivel angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-45 - 45°
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneFUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one26 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs26.1 W30 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.3 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to GUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (average)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source37 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs641.4 mm642 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs219.4 mm239 mm
Height (with stand)Differs444.5 mm436 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs4.8 kg8.95 kg
Width (without stand)Differs641.4 mm642 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs55 mm65 mm
Height (without stand)Differs383.1 mm391 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs4.25 kg5.71 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers704 mm755 mm
Package depthDiffers150 mm215 mm
Package heightDiffers520 mm469 mm
Package weightDiffers7.2 kg11.2 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersAC, Audio (3.5mm), DisplayPort, HDMI, VGAAC, DisplayPort, USB
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Gold, ENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
No flickeringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCB, CCC, CEL level 1, CU, ErP, FCC, ISO-9241-307, J-MOSS, PSE, UL/cUL, WEEE, WHQL, MEPS, RCM, TUVUnknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersACLCD
Packaging contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD Display Power Cable (1.5m) DisplayPort Cable (1.8m) USB3.0 Cable (1.8m) Quick Start Guide
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85285210Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons