Product comparison · 2 monitors

ASUS VH228D computer monitor vs LG W2246S-BF computer monitor

34specifications compared
11differ
23identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- VH228D computer monitor:50000000:1
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:30000:1
Viewable size diagonal
- VH228D computer monitor:54.6 cm
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:54.7 cm
Panel mounting interface
- VH228D computer monitor:100 x 100 mm
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slot
- VH228D computer monitor:Yes
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:No
Tilt angle range
- VH228D computer monitor:-5 - 20°
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:5 - 15°
Power consumption (typical)
- VH228D computer monitor:39 W
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:28 W
Width (without stand)
- VH228D computer monitor:515 mm
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:475.8 mm
Depth (without stand)
- VH228D computer monitor:220 mm
- W2246S-BF computer monitor:60.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VH228D, W2246S-BF
58 specifications	A ASUS VH228D computer monitor Model VH228D View product	B LG W2246S-BF computer monitor Model W2246S-BF View product
Display2 differ
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	50000000:1	30000:1
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	30 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	50 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	54.6 cm	54.7 cm
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in cameraKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomics3 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	75 x 75 mm
Cable lock slotDiffers	Yes	No
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 20°	5 - 15°
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	39 W	28 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	515 mm	475.8 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	220 mm	60.8 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	405 mm	303.5 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.6 kg	3.54 kg
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	475.8 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	169.9 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	303.5 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	588 x 162 x 452 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	7.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	UL/cUL, CB, ErP, FCC, CCC, BSMI, Gost-R, C-Tick, VCCI, PSB, J-MOSS, WEEE, Windows Vista WHQL	EPA 5.0
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL, CUL, FCC-B, EC, TUV, ISO 13406-2, TCO-05
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Home Premium x64

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons