Product comparison · 2 monitors

ASUS VB191T 19 vs iiyama ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display

18specifications compared
7differ
11identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- VB191T 19:48.3 cm (19")
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:43.2 cm (17")
Contrast ratio (typical)
- VB191T 19:2000:1
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- VB191T 19:170°
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:160°
Pixel pitch
- VB191T 19:0.294
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:0.264
Horizontal scan range
- VB191T 19:30 - 82 kHz
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:31 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan range
- VB191T 19:56 - 76 Hz
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:56 - 75 Hz
Power consumption (typical)
- VB191T 19:42 W
- ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display:40 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VB191T 19, ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display
44 specifications	A ASUS VB191T 19 View product	B iiyama ProLite P1704S-B1 LCD Display View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution	1280 x 1024 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)	300 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response time	5 ms	5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	2000:1	1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	160°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.294	0.264
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 82 kHz	31 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 76 Hz	56 - 75 Hz
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 82 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	56 - 76 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Business
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity	1	1
DVI-D ports quantity	1	1
PC Audio inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interface	100 x 100 mm	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slot	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slot type	Kensington	Kensington
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	20 - -5°	Unknown — not stated by the source
ErgonomicsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO '03
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	42 W	40 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (without stand)Known for one	413 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Depth (without stand)Known for one	210 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Height (without stand)Known for one	405 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	380 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	402.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	213.5 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	485 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	196 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	469 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Subwoofer RMS powerKnown for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	270.3 x 337.9 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC 100-240 V, 50 / 60Hz
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, CB, TÜV-GS, TÜV-ERGO
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VESA DDC2B
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons