Product comparison · 2 monitors

ASUS MZ27AQL computer monitor vs ASUS VP248QG computer monitor

49specifications compared
26differ
23identical
45known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
- VP248QG computer monitor:61 cm (24")
Display resolution
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:2560 x 1440 pixels
- VP248QG computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
HD type
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:Quad HD
- VP248QG computer monitor:Full HD
Panel type
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:IPS
- VP248QG computer monitor:TN
Display brightness (typical)
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:350 cd/m²
- VP248QG computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Response time
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:5 ms
- VP248QG computer monitor:1 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:178°
- VP248QG computer monitor:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- MZ27AQL computer monitor:178°
- VP248QG computer monitor:170°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MZ27AQL, VP248QG
94 specifications	A ASUS MZ27AQL computer monitor Model MZ27AQL View product	B ASUS VP248QG computer monitor Model VP248QG View product
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	61 cm (24")
Display resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1440 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Display technologyKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
HD typeDiffers	Quad HD	Full HD
Panel typeDiffers	IPS	TN
Display brightness (typical)Differs	350 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	1 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	2560 x 1440	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	100000000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	170°
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2768 x 0.2768 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 - 84 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 - 75 Hz
Performance1 differ
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSyncDiffers	No	Yes
Low Blue Light technologyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FreeSync
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	12 W	3 W
Design1 differ
Market positioningDiffers	Business	Gaming
Frameless designKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable standKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Feet colourKnown for one	Grey	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMIKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	2	1
HDMI versionKnown for one	1.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort versionKnown for one	1.2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio inputKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone connectivityKnown for one	3.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomics2 differ
VESA mountingDiffers	No	Yes
Height adjustmentDiffers	Yes	No
Adjustable height (max)Known for one	10 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
SwivellingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	-30 - 30°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	50 W	21.1 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.3 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.5 W	0.2 W
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	F
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21 kWh
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A to G
Weight & dimensions5 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	614 mm	571.1 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	267 mm	199.4 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	537 mm	405.8 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	4.7 kg	3.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	614 mm	571.1 mm
Depth (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	51.7 mm
Height (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	341.5 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.95 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	704 mm	625 mm
Package depthDiffers	605 mm	135 mm
Package heightDiffers	174 mm	461 mm
Package weightDiffers	7.2 kg	5.7 kg
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Stand includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for one	AC, DisplayPort	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in subwooferKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Subwoofer RMS powerKnown for one	5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	G	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL/cUL, Energy Star®, VCCI, MEPS, CCC, BSMI, CEL level 1, RCM, CB, WHQL (Windows 7, Windows 10, Windows 8.1), TUV Flicker-free , PSE, J-MOSS, PSB, KC , ErP, TUV Low Blue Light, FCC, WEEE, KCC, eStandby
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85285210

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons