Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC LM-565 computer monitor vs LG 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 2identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • LM-565 computer monitor:38.1 cm (15")
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:43.2 cm (17")
  • Display resolution
    • LM-565 computer monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • LM-565 computer monitor:250 cd/m²
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • LM-565 computer monitor:16 ms
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:2 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • LM-565 computer monitor:450:1
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:2000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • LM-565 computer monitor:120°
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • LM-565 computer monitor:100°
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • LM-565 computer monitor:0.297 x 0.297 mm
    • 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms:0.264

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of LM-565, 17-inch LCD TFT analog digital 2000:1 300cd/m2 2ms
37 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers38.1 cm (15")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers1024 x 768 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers16 ms2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs450:12000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers120°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers100°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.297 x 0.297 mm0.264
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one30 - 60 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one55 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
I/O portsKnown for oneD-sub; CEE22Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source75 x 75 mm
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 20°
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs25 W35 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs350 mm364.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs350 mm180 mm
Height (without stand)Differs84 mm378.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.8 kg3.5 kg
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffersUL, CSA, FCC, TUV/GS, CE, ISO 13406-2TCO03, DIN-ISO13406-2,TÜV-GS, CE, EPA Energy Star, CE, UL
CompatibilityKnown for oneVESA, SXGA, XGA, SVGA, VGA, MacUnknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one304 x 228 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneTCO03Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneSilverUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons