Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor vs AOC Q3277PQU computer monitor

93specifications compared
42differ
51identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:59.9 cm (23.6")
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:81.3 cm (32")
Display resolution
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:2560 x 1440 pixels
HD type
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:Full HD
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:Quad HD
Panel type
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:TN
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:MVA
Display brightness (typical)
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:350 cd/m²
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:300 cd/m²
Response time
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:1 ms
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:4 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:2560 x 1440
Contrast ratio (typical)
- 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor:1000:1
- Q3277PQU computer monitor:3000:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of G2460PF, Q3277PQU
124 specifications	A AOC 60 Series G2460PF computer monitor Model G2460PF View product	B AOC Q3277PQU computer monitor Model Q3277PQU View product
Display17 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	59.9 cm (23.6")	81.3 cm (32")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
HD typeDiffers	Full HD	Quad HD
Panel typeDiffers	TN	MVA
Display brightness (peak)Known for one	400 cd/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs	350 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	1 ms	4 ms
Display surfaceKnown for one	Matt	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)	2560 x 1440
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	3000:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	144 Hz	60 Hz
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	178°
Display number of coloursDiffers	16.78 million colours	1.073 billion colours
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 83 kHz	30 - 99 kHz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	53.1 cm	70.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	29.9 cm	39.9 cm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 160 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 146 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour depthDiffers	6 bit	8 bit
Grayscale depthKnown for one	8 bit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel frequencyDiffers	330 MHz	170 MHz
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1440p
sRGB coverage (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100%
3DKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for one	FreeSync Premium	Unknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSync refresh rate rangeKnown for one	30 - 144 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	4 W	6 W
Built-in cameraKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design3 differ
Market positioningDiffers	Gaming	Business
Product colourDiffers	Black	Black, Silver
Front bezel colourDiffers	Black/Red	Black
Feet colourKnown for one	Black, Red	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB hub versionDiffers	2.0	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Ergonomics2 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs	13 cm	18 cm
Pivot angleKnown for one	-45 - 45°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 22°	-5 - 24°
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	21 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	22.7 W	50 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.22 W	0.5 W
Energy efficiency scaleDiffers	A to G	A+ to F
Annual energy consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	73 kWh
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-25 - 55 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 85%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 93%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	565.4 mm	741.9 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	244.6 mm	171.2 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	393.6 mm	659 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	6.54 kg	11.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	565.4 mm	741.9 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	53 mm	60.8 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	342.9 mm	438.4 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	693 mm	577 mm
Package depthDiffers	187 mm	248 mm
Package heightDiffers	423 mm	858 mm
Package weightDiffers	8.55 kg	15.3 kg
USB cable lengthKnown for one	1.8 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 m
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, Audio (3.5mm), DisplayPort, DVI, USB, VGA	AC, Audio (3.5mm), DVI, DisplayPort, HDMI, VGA
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	ENERGY STAR, EPEAT Gold	EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Doesn't containKnown for one	BRF, PVC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bezel thickness typeDiffers	Normal	Narrow
Compliance certificatesDiffers	RoHS, EuP	RoHS
i-Care technologyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	B
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	85285210	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons