Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC 936Swa computer monitor vs EIZO G20 computer monitor

16specifications compared
11differ
5identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The EIZO G20 computer monitor has 450 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the AOC 936Swa computer monitor (700 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The EIZO G20 computer monitor has 20 ms more response time than the AOC 936Swa computer monitor (25 ms vs 5 ms). The EIZO G20 computer monitor has 10° more viewing angle, vertical than the AOC 936Swa computer monitor (170° vs 160°). Only the AOC 936Swa computer monitor has built-in speaker(s). Display diagonal: 47 cm (18.5") on the AOC 936Swa computer monitor, 51 cm (20.1") on the EIZO G20 computer monitor.

Display diagonal
- 936Swa computer monitor:47 cm (18.5")
- G20 computer monitor:51 cm (20.1")
Display resolution
- 936Swa computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
- G20 computer monitor:1200 x 1600 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- 936Swa computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- G20 computer monitor:700 cd/m²
Response time
- 936Swa computer monitor:5 ms
- G20 computer monitor:25 ms
Viewing angle, vertical
- 936Swa computer monitor:160°
- G20 computer monitor:170°
Built-in speaker(s)
- 936Swa computer monitor:Yes
- G20 computer monitor:No
Power consumption (typical)
- 936Swa computer monitor:25 W
- G20 computer monitor:65 W
Width (without stand)
- 936Swa computer monitor:463.1 mm
- G20 computer monitor:347 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 936Swa, G20
28 specifications	A AOC 936Swa computer monitor Model 936Swa View product	B EIZO G20 computer monitor Model G20 View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	47 cm (18.5")	51 cm (20.1")
Display resolutionDiffers	1366 x 768 pixels	1200 x 1600 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	700 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	170°
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	31.5 - 75 kHz
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.3 x 0.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	Yes	No
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Medical
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	25 W	65 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	463.1 mm	347 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	186 mm	86.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	358.7 mm	449 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.63 kg	7.3 kg
Other featuresidentical
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	1366 x 768	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons