Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor vs AOC 931Sn computer monitor

Add a product
  • 32specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 14identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the AOC 931Sn computer monitor (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor has 1,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the AOC 931Sn computer monitor (2000:1 vs 1000:1). The AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor has 43.4 cm more viewable size diagonal than the AOC 931Sn computer monitor (48.1 cm vs 4.7 cm). Only the AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor has HDCP. Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the AOC 919Vwa+ computer monitor, 47 cm (18.5") on the AOC 931Sn computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
    • 931Sn computer monitor:47 cm (18.5")
  • Display resolution
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
    • 931Sn computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:16:10
    • 931Sn computer monitor:16:9
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:300 cd/m²
    • 931Sn computer monitor:250 cd/m²
  • Aspect ratio
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:16:10
    • 931Sn computer monitor:16:9
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:2000:1
    • 931Sn computer monitor:1000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:0.2835 x 0.2835 mm
    • 931Sn computer monitor:0.3 x 0.3 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 919Vwa+ computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
    • 931Sn computer monitor:30 - 80 kHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 919Vwa+, 931Sn
40 specifications
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers48.3 cm (19")47 cm (18.5")
Display resolutionDiffers1440 x 900 pixels1366 x 768 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs2000:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)60000:160000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal170°170°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2835 x 0.2835 mm0.3 x 0.3 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 83 kHz30 - 80 kHz
Vertical scan range55 - 75 Hz55 - 75 Hz
Viewable size diagonalDiffers48.1 cm4.7 cm
Pixel frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85 MHz
Multimediaidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in cameraNoNo
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity00
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers10
DVI-I ports quantity00
HDCPDiffersYesNo
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs37 W25 W
Power consumption (standby)1 W1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs439 mm455.2 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs190 mm219.7 mm
Height (without stand)Differs365 mm357.9 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.7 g3.89 kg
Other features2 differ
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one408.24 x 255.15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one110 - 240VAC, 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsDiffersDDC 1/2B/CIDDC1 / 2B / CI or VESA DDC2B
CertificationDiffersCUL, FCC, CCC, CE, RoHS, Windows Vista Premium, TCO 03, TUV/S, TUV-bauart, EPEAT silver, GOST, ISO 13406-2cUL, CCC, EPA, TUV/S, FCC, CE, RoHS, Windows Vista Basic, EPEAT silver, ISO13406-2, GOST
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110~264 VAC
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons