Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC 2241Vg computer monitor vs AOC e2437Fh computer monitor

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 11identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC e2437Fh computer monitor has 19,940,000 :1 more contrast ratio (dynamic) than the AOC 2241Vg computer monitor (20000000:1 vs 60000:1). The AOC e2437Fh computer monitor has 1 - 83 kHz more horizontal scan range than the AOC 2241Vg computer monitor (31 - 83 kHz vs 30 - 83 kHz). The AOC 2241Vg computer monitor has 1 more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity than the AOC e2437Fh computer monitor (1 vs 0). Only the AOC e2437Fh computer monitor has built-in speaker(s). Only the AOC 2241Vg computer monitor has built-in camera.

  • Display diagonal
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:61 cm (24")
  • Display resolution
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:16:10
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:16:9
  • Aspect ratio
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:16:10
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:16:9
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:60000:1
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:20000000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:0.276 x 0.276 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:30 - 83 kHz
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:31 - 83 kHz
  • Built-in speaker(s)
    • 2241Vg computer monitor:No
    • e2437Fh computer monitor:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2241Vg, e2437Fh
45 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")61 cm (24")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs60000:120000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.282 x 0.282 mm0.276 x 0.276 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 83 kHz31 - 83 kHz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one55.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFull HD
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source53.1 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source29.9 cm
Multimedia2 differ
Built-in speaker(s)DiffersNoYes
Built-in cameraDiffersYesNo
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB hub versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers10
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomics1 differ
Cable lock slotDiffersNoYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStand-by
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs20 W28 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.1 W0.5 W
Weight & dimensions5 differ
Weight (with stand)Differs6.81 kg6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs522.3 mm505.6 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs186.8 mm178.8 mm
Height (without stand)Differs413.4 mm365.7 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5.15 kg3.5 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one474 x 296 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one110 - 240VAC, 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for onecCSAus, FCC, CE, CCC, TUV-Bauart, TUS-S, EPA, China RoHS, Win 7, GHOST, Ukrain Safety, ISO 9241-307, EPEAT SilverUnknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons