Product comparison · 2 monitors

AOC 210S computer monitor vs AOC LM-565 computer monitor

15specifications compared
13differ
2identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 210S computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
- LM-565 computer monitor:38.1 cm (15")
Display resolution
- 210S computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
- LM-565 computer monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- 210S computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- LM-565 computer monitor:250 cd/m²
Response time
- 210S computer monitor:5 ms
- LM-565 computer monitor:16 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- 210S computer monitor:2000:1
- LM-565 computer monitor:450:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 210S computer monitor:170°
- LM-565 computer monitor:120°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 210S computer monitor:160°
- LM-565 computer monitor:100°
Pixel pitch
- 210S computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
- LM-565 computer monitor:0.297 x 0.297 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 210S, LM-565
29 specifications	A AOC 210S computer monitor Model 210S View product	B AOC LM-565 computer monitor Model LM-565 View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	55.9 cm (22")	38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers	1680 x 1050 pixels	1024 x 768 pixels
Touchscreen	No	No
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	16 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	2000:1	450:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	120°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	100°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.282 x 0.282 mm	0.297 x 0.297 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyDiffers	30 - 83 kHz	30 - 60 kHz
Digital vertical frequency	55 - 75 Hz	55 - 75 Hz
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	sRGB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Composite syncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Silver
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	D-sub; CEE22
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	505 mm	350 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	408 mm	350 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	195 mm	84 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.81 kg	2.8 kg
Other featuresidentical
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VESA, SXGA, XGA, SVGA, VGA, Mac
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	304 x 228 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 Hz
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO03
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL, CSA, FCC, TUV/GS, CE, ISO 13406-2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons