Product comparison · 2 monitors

AG Neovo X-W22 computer monitor vs Samsung T220HD computer monitor

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 14identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

  • Response time
    • X-W22 computer monitor:3 ms
    • T220HD computer monitor:5 ms
  • Horizontal scan range
    • X-W22 computer monitor:24 - 80 kHz
    • T220HD computer monitor:30 - 81 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • X-W22 computer monitor:50 - 76 Hz
    • T220HD computer monitor:50 - 85 Hz
  • RMS rated power
    • X-W22 computer monitor:4 W
    • T220HD computer monitor:6 W
  • Product colour
    • X-W22 computer monitor:White
    • T220HD computer monitor:Red
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • X-W22 computer monitor:50 W
    • T220HD computer monitor:58 W
  • Width (without stand)
    • X-W22 computer monitor:512 mm
    • T220HD computer monitor:520 mm
  • Depth (without stand)
    • X-W22 computer monitor:155 mm
    • T220HD computer monitor:86.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of X-W22, T220HD
53 specifications
Display3 differ
Response timeDiffers3 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one1000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one3000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers24 - 80 kHz30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 76 Hz50 - 85 Hz
Multimedia1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers4 W6 W
Built-in cameraKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteRed
Ports & interfacesidentical
Audio inputKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Composite video inKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
PC Audio inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
SCART ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Component video (YPbPr/YCbCr) inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one-5 - 25°Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs50 W58 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs512 mm520 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs155 mm86.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs392 mm373.5 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one6.9 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (side)Known for one1.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source520 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source215 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source441.5 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.8 kg
Packaging data2 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs586 x 195 x 508 mm601 x 156 x 542 mm
Package weightDiffers10.5 kg8 kg
Other features1 differ
BandwidthKnown for one0.190 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one40000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersFCC, UL/CUL, NOM, CB, CE TUV/Baurt, BSMI, NORDIC, EPA, GOST, WEEE, RoHS DDC-2B, DDC-CIISO 13406/2, CE
TV tuner integratedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright³, MagicTune, MagicWizard
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons